Publication: Respond to "Duplications" by Drelichman and Voth
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
2016-10-01
Defense date
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
Abstract
In this response, we demonstrate that Mauricio Drelichman and Hans-Joachim Voth,
in their 2015 Economic History Review note ‘Duplication without constraints: A´ lvarez-
Nogal and Chamley’s analysis of debt policy under Philip II’, provide a misconceived
and inaccurate account of our argument about the finances of Philip II in ‘Debt policy
under constraints: Philip II, the Cortes, and Genoese bankers’ (Economic History
Review, 2014). Here,we summarize our position in the context of the current literature
and provide a few comments on data gathering.
Description
Keywords
Philip II, Genoese bankers, Juros
Bibliographic citation
Álvarez-Nogal, C., & Chamley, C. P. (2016). Response to ‘Duplications’ by Drelichman and Voth. The Economic History Review, 69 (3), pp. 1007-1013.