Publication:
Respond to "Duplications" by Drelichman and Voth

Thumbnail Image
Identifiers
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10016/35172
ISSN: 0013-0117
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12339
UXXI: AR/0000020501
Files
response_EHR_2016_ps.pdf (541.54 KB)
Publication date
2016-10-01
Defense date
Authors
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
Impact
Google Scholar
Export
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
In this response, we demonstrate that Mauricio Drelichman and Hans-Joachim Voth, in their 2015 Economic History Review note ‘Duplication without constraints: A´ lvarez- Nogal and Chamley’s analysis of debt policy under Philip II’, provide a misconceived and inaccurate account of our argument about the finances of Philip II in ‘Debt policy under constraints: Philip II, the Cortes, and Genoese bankers’ (Economic History Review, 2014). Here,we summarize our position in the context of the current literature and provide a few comments on data gathering.
Description
Keywords
Philip II, Genoese bankers, Juros
Bibliographic citation
Álvarez-Nogal, C., & Chamley, C. P. (2016). Response to ‘Duplications’ by Drelichman and Voth. The Economic History Review, 69 (3), pp. 1007-1013.
Collections
DCS - Artículos de Revistas