RT Journal Article
T1 Respond to "Duplications" by Drelichman and Voth
A1 Álvarez Nogal, Carlos
A1 Chamley, Christophe
AB In this response, we demonstrate that Mauricio Drelichman and Hans-Joachim Voth,in their 2015 Economic History Review note ‘Duplication without constraints: A´ lvarez-Nogal and Chamley’s analysis of debt policy under Philip II’, provide a misconceivedand inaccurate account of our argument about the finances of Philip II in ‘Debt policyunder constraints: Philip II, the Cortes, and Genoese bankers’ (Economic HistoryReview, 2014). Here,we summarize our position in the context of the current literatureand provide a few comments on data gathering.
PB Wiley
SN 0013-0117
YR 2016
FD 2016-10-01
LK https://hdl.handle.net/10016/35172
UL https://hdl.handle.net/10016/35172
LA eng
DS e-Archivo
RD 1 sept. 2024