Publication: El uso de argumentos religiosos en el espacio público: un debate norteamericano en términos de public reason
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
2011-06
Defense date
Authors
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto de Derechos Humanos Bartolomé de las Casas; Dykinson
Impact
Export
Abstract
Es objetivo del presente artículo el tratamiento del debate filosófico norteamericano en torno al uso de la argumentación religiosa en el espacio público. Se propone una evaluación de la posiciones nucleares de este debate tomando en consideración la jurisprudencia constitucional y el desarrollo doctrinal con base en la public reason rawlsiana. La llamada neutralidad liberal, las pretensiones de establecer una equivalencia epistemológica entre argumentos religiosos y seculares y la apuesta por garantizar la estabilidad institucional a través del reconocimiento religioso, son consideradas las principales claves interpretativas desde la que enjuiciar con solvencia las
The aim of this paper is to address the American philosophical debate regarding the use of religious argumentation in the public sphere. Taking into account constitutional case-law, and built upon rawlsian public reason, an evaluation of core positions within this debate is proposed. The so-called liberal neutrality, the pretensions to equate secular and religious arguments from an epistemological point of view and the claims to ensure institutional stability through religious recognition are considered the main interpretative keys to fully assess current positions on this controversial issue.
The aim of this paper is to address the American philosophical debate regarding the use of religious argumentation in the public sphere. Taking into account constitutional case-law, and built upon rawlsian public reason, an evaluation of core positions within this debate is proposed. The so-called liberal neutrality, the pretensions to equate secular and religious arguments from an epistemological point of view and the claims to ensure institutional stability through religious recognition are considered the main interpretative keys to fully assess current positions on this controversial issue.
Description
Keywords
argumentación religiosa, razón pública, neutralidad liberal, neutralidad liberal, religious argumentation, argumentation, public reason, liberal neutrality
Bibliographic citation
Derechos y Libertades: revista de filosofía del derecho y derechos humanos, junio 2011, n. 25, pp. 203-235