Publication:
Digital technology-based solutions for enhanced effectiveness of secured transactions law:the road to perfection?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers
Publication date
2018-05
Defense date
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Duke Law School
Impact
Google Scholar
Export
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
This article has two objectives. First, the article examines how the incorporation of specific digital technologies to the different stages of secured transactions could mitigate the imperfections of the secured transactions system and enhance its effectiveness. To begin with, an envisioned integrated ecosystem of smart property and self-executed smart contracts for security agreements could effectively reduce verification and monitoring costs. Next, a fully automatic electronic—maybe, blockchain-based—registry fed by a (IoT) network of interconnected assets would dramatically improve the accuracy of consistently-updated registered information. Furthermore, implanted AI-based solutions could be used to detect changes of circumstances and deviations from agreed provisions. Finally, AI-guided smart contracts could assist in decisionmaking to prevent breaches and automatically enforce remedies.8 Second, given this backdrop, the article focuses on some of the legal implications for secured transactions legal system and assesses whether the current legal framework is prepared to face the challenges inherent to these new technologies, to exploit the multitude of opportunities presented by the technologies, and to manage the involved risks. Alternatively, if the current system is incapable of taking on this challenge, this article will consider an appropriate legal response.
Description
Keywords
Digital technology, Collateral security, Blockchains, Internet of things, Commercial law
Bibliographic citation
Rodríguez de las Heras Ballell, T. (2018), Digital Technology-Based Solutions for Enhanced Effectiveness of Secured Transactions Law: The Road to Perfection?, Law and Contemporary Problems, 81(1), pp. 21-44