Publication:
Towards a Uniform Standard of Rules 5 and 6 of the IBA Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration.

Simple item page
dc.affiliation.areaUC3M. Área de Derecho Mercantiles
dc.affiliation.dptoUC3M. Departamento de Derecho Privadoes
dc.affiliation.grupoinvUC3M. Grupo de Investigación: Sociedad, Tecnología y Derecho mercantil (SOCITEC)es
dc.contributor.authorPerales Viscasillas, María Pilar
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)es
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T13:10:58Z
dc.date.available2022-11-24T13:10:58Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-30
dc.description.abstractThe rules applicable to arbitration of both hard and soft law share the importance of the independence and impartiality of the arbitrator. A particular treatment of a type of conflict of interest that may occur during the arbitration procedure is that regulated by Rules 5 and 6 of the IBA Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration (2013), referring to a modification in the team of representatives or legal advisors of one of the parties that causes a conflict of interest in one of the arbitrators that seriously questions his independence or impartiality, and that consequently opens the door to his possible disqualification, and to the need to protect the integrity of the arbitration procedure by the arbitrators. In this paper, we analyze if the standards provided in Rules 5 and 6 to resolve the conflict of interest between lawyers and arbitrators have received a favorable response within the arbitration community. And if so, whether an international consensus can be achieved that can serve as a model for a future Code of Ethics at a truly transnational level.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is part of the Research Project of the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (DER2016-78572-P).es
dc.format.extent134es
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPerales Viscasillas, P. (2019). Towards a Uniform Standard of Rules 5 and 6 of the IBA Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration. Nordic Journal of Commercial Law, nº 2, pp. 112-134.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.njcl.v0i2.3508
dc.identifier.issn1459-9686
dc.identifier.publicationissue2es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage112es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleNordic Journal of Commercial Lawen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10016/36104
dc.identifier.uxxiAR/0000025052
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherAalborg Universitetsforlages
dc.relation.projectIDGobierno de España. DER2016-78572-Pes
dc.rights© The authores
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.ecienciaDerechoes
dc.titleTowards a Uniform Standard of Rules 5 and 6 of the IBA Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration.es
dc.typeresearch article*
dc.type.hasVersionVoR*
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
towards_NJCL_2019.pdf
Size:
441.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Sociedad, Tecnología y Derecho mercantil (SOCITEC). Artículos de revistas
Proyectos FOS (2022-2023)