Publication: Uso abusivo de las interinidades en el empleo público: un importante pronunciamiento del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea. Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea de 19 de marzo de 2020. Asuntos Servicio Madrileño de Salud, C 103/18 y C 429/18
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
2020-07-01
Defense date
Authors
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Thomson Reuters
Impact
Export
Abstract
Las interinidades de larga duración en el empleo público, ya se traten de contratos laborales como, de forma particular, de relaciones de servicio sometidas al Derecho Administrativo, es un fenómeno que, no por habitual y extendido, deja de constituir una práctica contraria a la Directiva Comunitaria sobre empleo temporal. Y ello tanto si se trata de prestaciones de servicios reguladas mediante sucesivos contratos temporales de esa naturaleza como también si se trata de un vínculo jurídico único pero de una duración tan desmesurada que es imposible sostener que obedece a necesidades temporales del ente público que es la única razón que justifica dicha temporalidad. La Sentencia del TJUE que constituye el leiv motiv del presente trabajo, una más de las que se vienen sucediendo en los últimos años, propone fórmulas para prevenir y combatir esa práctica abusiva que, como otras que la han precedido, seguramente dará origen a un intenso debate jurídico que el presente trabajo sólo tiene la intención de desvelar y proponer interpretaciones a las que la Sentencia puede servir de fundamento.
The substitution contract in the public emplyment, whether they are employment contracts or, in particular, service relationships subject to Administrative Law, is a phenomenon that, not by usual and widespread, ceases to constitute a practice contrary to the EU Directive on temporary employment. And this is true whether it is a matter of provision of services regulated by successivetemporary contracts of this nature, as well as a single legal link, but of such an excessive duration that it is impossible to maintain that it is due to the temporary needs of the public entity, which is the only reason that justifies this temporality. The CJEU Judgment that constitutes the leiv motiv of this work, one more than those that have been happening in recent years, proposes ways to prevent and combat this abusive practice that, like others that have preceded it, will surely give rise to an intense legal debate that the present work is only intended to reveal and propose interpretations to which the Judgment can serve as a basis.
The substitution contract in the public emplyment, whether they are employment contracts or, in particular, service relationships subject to Administrative Law, is a phenomenon that, not by usual and widespread, ceases to constitute a practice contrary to the EU Directive on temporary employment. And this is true whether it is a matter of provision of services regulated by successivetemporary contracts of this nature, as well as a single legal link, but of such an excessive duration that it is impossible to maintain that it is due to the temporary needs of the public entity, which is the only reason that justifies this temporality. The CJEU Judgment that constitutes the leiv motiv of this work, one more than those that have been happening in recent years, proposes ways to prevent and combat this abusive practice that, like others that have preceded it, will surely give rise to an intense legal debate that the present work is only intended to reveal and propose interpretations to which the Judgment can serve as a basis.
Description
Keywords
Contrato de interinidad y empleo público, Prevención de su uso abusivo, Justificación, Substitution contract and public employment, Ways to prevent the abusive use of this type of contract
Bibliographic citation
Barcelón Cobedo, S. (2020). Uso abusivo de las interinidades en el empleo público: un importante pronunciamiento del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea. Nueva Revista Española de Derecho delTrabajo, 233, pp. 313-342