Citation:
Barbero G., J. Fernando, et al. On-shell equivalence of general relativity and Holst theories with nonmetricity, torsion, and boundaries. In: Physical Review D 105, 064066, March 2022
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-contributor-funder:
Comunidad de Madrid Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Agencia Estatal de Investigación (España)
Sponsor:
This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia Innovación y Universidades-Agencia Estatal de Investigación FIS2017-84440-C2-2-P and PID2020-116567GB-C22 grants. Juan Margalef-Bentabol is supported by the AARMS postdoctoral fellowship, by the NSERC Discovery Grant No. 2018-04873, and the NSERC Grant RGPIN-2018-04887. E.J.S. Villaseñor is supported by the Madrid Government (Comunidad de Madrid-Spain) under the Multiannual Agreement with UC3M in the line of Excellence of University Professors (EPUC3M23), and in
the context of the V PRICIT (Regional Programme of Research and Technological Innovation).
Project:
Gobierno de España. FIS2017-84440-C2-2-P Gobierno de España. PID2020-116567GB-C22
Keywords:
First order gravity
,
Holst action
,
Boundaries
,
Covariant methods
We study a generalization of the Holst action where we admit nonmetricity and torsion in manifolds with timelike boundaries (both in the metric and tetrad formalism). We prove that its space of solutions is equal to the one of the Palatini action. Therefore, wWe study a generalization of the Holst action where we admit nonmetricity and torsion in manifolds with timelike boundaries (both in the metric and tetrad formalism). We prove that its space of solutions is equal to the one of the Palatini action. Therefore, we conclude that the metric sector is in fact identical to general relativity (GR), which is defined by the Einstein-Hilbert action. We further prove that, despite defining the same space of solutions, the Palatini and (the generalized) Holst Lagrangians are not cohomologically equal. Thus, the presymplectic structure and charges provided by the covariant phase space method might differ. However, using the relative bicomplex framework, we show the covariant phase spaces of both theories are equivalent (and in fact equivalent to GR), as well as their charges, clarifying some open problems regarding dual charges and their equivalence in different formulations.[+][-]