Publication: Fair student placement
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
2017-03-25
Defense date
Authors
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Impact
Export
Abstract
We revisit the concept of fairness in the Student Placement framework. We declare an allocation as alfa" role="presentation" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-table; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; font-size: 17px; text-indent: 0px; text-align: left; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: normal; word-spacing: normal; word-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; position: relative;">alfaalfa-equitable if no agent can propose an alternative allocation that nobody else might argue to be inequitable. It turns out that alfa" role="presentation" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-table; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; font-size: 17px; text-indent: 0px; text-align: left; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: normal; word-spacing: normal; word-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; position: relative;">alfaalfa-equity is compatible with efficiency. Our analysis fills a gap in the literature by giving normative support to the allocations improving, in terms of efficiency, the Student Optimal Stable allocation.
Description
Keywords
Student placement, Fair matching
Bibliographic citation
Alcalde, J., Romero-Medina, A., (2017). Fair student placemen. Theory and Decision, v. 83, n. 2, pp. 293-307.