Publication: Pluralismo jurídico y Derecho alternativo: dos modelos de análisis
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
2012-07
Defense date
Authors
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto de derechos humanos Bartolomé de las Casas
Impact
Export
Abstract
El presente artículo pone de manifiesto el carácter polisémico del pluralismo jurídico y el derecho alternativo, así como la interrelación que existe entre ambas perspectivas. A fin de despejar algunas confusiones y equívocos que subyacen en el contexto del pluralismo jurídico, se distinguen dos modelos análisis. Por un lado, el pluralismo jurídico en estricto sentido; y por el otro, el pluralismo jurídico de base monista, señalando que sólo en el primero de ellos, es susceptible una lectura en clave de paradigma en el contexto a la crítica de la ciencia jurídica tradicional
This article highlights the multiple meanings of legal pluralism and alternative law, as well as the relationship that exist between both perspectives. In order to clarify certain confusions and misunderstandings that underlie the context of legal pluralism, two analytical models are proposed. On one hand, the legal pluralism in the strict sense, and on the other hand, the legal pluralism of monistic basis, pointing out that only in the first one it is possible a reading in paradigm terms within the framework of the criticism to the traditional jurisprudence
This article highlights the multiple meanings of legal pluralism and alternative law, as well as the relationship that exist between both perspectives. In order to clarify certain confusions and misunderstandings that underlie the context of legal pluralism, two analytical models are proposed. On one hand, the legal pluralism in the strict sense, and on the other hand, the legal pluralism of monistic basis, pointing out that only in the first one it is possible a reading in paradigm terms within the framework of the criticism to the traditional jurisprudence
Description
Keywords
Pluralismo jurídico, monismo jurídico, sistemas normativos, derecho estatal, derecho alternativo, Legal pluralism, legal monism, normative systems, State Law, alternative Law
Bibliographic citation
Universitas: Revista de Filosofía, Derecho y Política, n. 16, julio 2012, p. 215-244