Publication: Privacidad frente al uso de drones con fines periodísticos. Marco regulador de Estados Unidos y Europa
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
2021-03
Defense date
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad de Piura
Impact
Export
Abstract
El artículo analiza la repercusión en la actividad periodística de las medidas reguladoras aprobadas por parte de Estados Unidos y Europa para proteger la privacidad frente al uso de drones. Se estudian las similitudes y diferencias entre las disposiciones adoptadas. Se observa que en Estados Unidos se opta por recomendaciones, donde prevalece la voluntariedad del usuario del dron frente al derecho de terceros a la privacidad. Si bien hay excepciones, como los casos de los estados de Texas y California, donde se considera un delito contra la privacidad el uso de drones sin la debida autorización. En Europa, la normativa es aplicable a todos los países miembros, y el sistema es más garantista, considerando los principios de necesidad y transparencia.
This article analyzes the repercussions on journalistic activity of the regulatory measures adopted by the United States and Europe to protect privacy in the use of drones. Similarities and diffe-rences between the adopted regulations are evaluated. It is observed that in the United States recom-mendations are generally chosen, in which drone user´s willingness prevails over third parties´ right to privacy. However, there are exceptions, such as the cases of the states of Texas and California, where the use of drones without proper authorization is considered a violation of the right to privacy. In Europe, the regulations are applicable to all member countries, and the system provides more guarantees, con-sidering the principles of necessity and transparency.
This article analyzes the repercussions on journalistic activity of the regulatory measures adopted by the United States and Europe to protect privacy in the use of drones. Similarities and diffe-rences between the adopted regulations are evaluated. It is observed that in the United States recom-mendations are generally chosen, in which drone user´s willingness prevails over third parties´ right to privacy. However, there are exceptions, such as the cases of the states of Texas and California, where the use of drones without proper authorization is considered a violation of the right to privacy. In Europe, the regulations are applicable to all member countries, and the system provides more guarantees, con-sidering the principles of necessity and transparency.
Description
Keywords
Dron, Periodismo, Privacidad, Legislación, Estados Unidos, Europa, Drone, Journalism, Privacy, Legislation, United States, Europe
Bibliographic citation
Aguado-Guadalupe, G. (2021). Privacidad frente al uso de drones con fines periodísticos. Marco regulador de Estados Unidos y Europa. Revista de Comunicación, 20(1), 11–27.