Publication:
Overview of Architectural Alternatives for the Integration of ETSI MEC Environments from Different Administrative Domains

Simple item page
dc.affiliation.dptoUC3M. Departamento de Ingeniería Telemáticaes
dc.affiliation.grupoinvUC3M. Grupo de Investigación: Network Technologieses
dc.contributor.authorContreras Murillo, Luis Miguel
dc.contributor.authorBernardos Cano, Carlos Jesús
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissionen
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T14:15:39Z
dc.date.available2020-10-05T14:15:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-28
dc.descriptionThis article belongs to the Special Issue Cloud Computing and Applicationsen
dc.description.abstractMulti-access Edge Computing (MEC) is proposed as a standard framework for the provision and consumption of applications and services in proximity to the end-users of network operators. Proximity has been identified as one of the enablers of the forthcoming 5G, where extreme low latency and large bandwidth will be necessary for some services. However, the need of proximity imposes to network operators the necessity of huge investments in order to distribute computing capabilities towards the access. A less investment intensive approach would consist on sharing infrastructures by integrating MEC environments from different operators or providers. This could open the door to new business models on the one hand, as well as to avoid restrictions in terms of space, energy of regulation, on the other. This paper overviews different integration options by analyzing the MEC framework defined by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) and identifying different architectural alternatives as well as the business and technical aspects that need to be taken into consideration for realizing such integration.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been partly funded by the European Commission through the projects EU-TW 5GDIVE (Grant Agreement no. 859881) and H2020 5GROWTH (Grant Agreement no. 856709). This information reflects the consortia views, but neither the consortia nor the European Commission are liable for any use that may be done of the information contained therein.en
dc.format.extent20
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationContreras, L.M. y Bernardos, C.J. (2020). Overview of Architectural Alternatives for the Integration of ETSI MEC Environments from Different Administrative Domains. Electronics, 9, 1392.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9091392
dc.identifier.issn2079-9292
dc.identifier.publicationissue9
dc.identifier.publicationtitleElectronicsen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10016/31052
dc.identifier.uxxiAR/0000026035
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/859881en
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/856709en
dc.rights© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.en
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.ecienciaTelecomunicacioneses
dc.subject.otherFederationen
dc.subject.otherMECen
dc.subject.otherMulti-domainen
dc.titleOverview of Architectural Alternatives for the Integration of ETSI MEC Environments from Different Administrative Domainsen
dc.typeresearch article*
dc.type.hasVersionVoR*
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
overview_EMDPI_2020.pdf
Size:
1.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
DIT - RYSC - Artículos en Revistas Internacionales / International Journals
OpenAIRE: Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe