Publication:
Comparative analysis between a respeaking captioning system and a captioning system without human intervention

dc.contributor.authorRuiz Arroyo, Adrián
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Crespo, Ángel
dc.contributor.authorFuenmayor González, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Goncalves, Roxana del Valle
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-02T09:53:45Z
dc.date.available2023-11-02T09:53:45Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-11
dc.description.abstractPeople living with deafness or hearing impairment have limited access to information broadcast live on television. Live closed captioning is a currently active area of study; to our knowledge, there is no system developed thus far that produces high-quality captioning results without using scripts or human interaction. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the quality of captions generated for four Spanish news programs by two captioning systems: a semiautomatic system based on respeaking (system currently used by a Spanish TV station) and an automatic system without human interaction proposed and developed by the authors. The analysis is conducted by measuring and comparing the accuracy, latency and speed of the captions generated by both captioning systems. The captions generated by the system presented higher quality considering the accuracy in terms of Word Error Rate (WER between 3.76 and 7.29%) and latency of the captions (approximately 4 s) at an acceptable speed to access the information. We contribute a first study focused on the development and analysis of an automatic captioning system without human intervention with promising quality results. These results reinforce the importance of continuing to study these automatic systems.en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRuiz-Arroyo, A., Garcia-Crespo, A., Fuenmayor-Gonzalez, F. et al. Comparative analysis between a respeaking captioning system and a captioning system without human intervention. Univ Access Inf Soc (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00926-3en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00926-3
dc.identifier.issn1615-5289
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage1es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage12es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleUniversal Access in the Information Societyen
dc.identifier.publicationvolume2022es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10016/38734
dc.identifier.uxxiAR/0000031796
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.rights© 2022, The Author(s)en
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.subject.ecienciaInformáticaes
dc.subject.ecienciaIngeniería Mecánicaes
dc.subject.otherautomated closed captioningen
dc.subject.otherASRen
dc.subject.otherautomatic speech recognitionen
dc.subject.otherlive broadcastingen
dc.titleComparative analysis between a respeaking captioning system and a captioning system without human interventionen
dc.typeresearch article*
dc.type.hasVersionVoR*
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
comparative_UAIS_2022.pdf
Size:
3.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: