Publication:
Comparison of Flight FTC Techniques: from standard and structured H∞, to self-scheduling and LPV

Simple item page
dc.affiliation.dptoUC3M. Departamento de Ingeniería Aeroespaciales
dc.affiliation.grupoinvUC3M. Grupo de Investigación: Equipo de Propulsión Espacial y Plasmas (EP2)es
dc.contributor.authorMarcos Esteban, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorWaitman, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorSato, Masayuki
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissiones
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-28T14:12:40Z
dc.date.available2023-04-28T14:12:40Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-27
dc.description.abstractIn this article several robust control design techniques are compared via their application to the fault tolerant control problem for the lateral/directional motion of JAXA's research aircraft MuPAL-α. The techniques used include: (i) a single, passive-FTC, robust structured H∞ design, (ii) single, active-FTC, robust standard and structured H∞ designs, (iii) manual scheduling schemes from the previous designs, (iv) a self-scheduled structured H∞ design, and (v) a linear parameter varying design. All the designs were implemented in the onboard computer and validated in the so-called Aircraft-In-the-Loop configuration, which entails the operation of the full aircraft in fly-by-wire mode in the hangar. The results show that all the approaches provided acceptable solutions, but with the last two techniques resulting in a more homogeneous performance throughout the fault and command scenarios tested.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by the EU Horizon 2020 grant agreement No. 690 811 and Japan NEDO grant agreement No. 062800 for the project entitled ”Validation of Integrated Safety-enhanced Intelligent flight Control (VISION)”. The first author also acknowledges funding for Beatriz Galindo Distinguished Researchers from the VPRICIT framework of the Comunidad de Madrid with UC3M.en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMarcos Esteban, Andres; Waitman, Sergio; Sato, Masayuki (2022). Comparison of Flight FTC Techniques: from standard and structured H∞, to self-scheduling and LPV. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55 (35), pp. 61-66es
dc.identifier.isbn2405-8963
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage61es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage66es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleIFAC-PapersOnLinees
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10016/37229
dc.identifier.uxxiCC/0000034263
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.relation.eventdate2022-09-27es
dc.relation.eventplaceCANADAes
dc.relation.eventtitle5th IFAC Workshop on Linear Parameter Varying Systems LPVS 2022es
dc.relation.ispartofseries35es
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/690811es
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors.en
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.ecienciaAeronáuticaes
dc.subject.otherRobust controlen
dc.subject.otherFault tolerant controlen
dc.subject.otherFlight controlen
dc.titleComparison of Flight FTC Techniques: from standard and structured H∞, to self-scheduling and LPVen
dc.typeconference proceedings*
dc.type.hasVersionVoR*
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
comparision_marcos_IFAC_2022.pdf
Size:
1.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
DBIAB - AERO - EP2 - Proceedings