Margalef Bentabol, JuanSánchez Villaseñor, Eduardo Jesús2021-03-232021-03-232021-01-15Margalef-Bentabol, J. & Villaseñor, E. J. S. (2021). Geometric formulation of the covariant phase space methods with boundaries. Physical Review D, 103(2).2470-0010https://hdl.handle.net/10016/32206We analyze in full detail the geometric structure of the covariant phase space (CPS) of any local field theory defined over a space-time with boundary. To this end, we introduce a new frame: the "relative bicomplex framework." It is the result of merging an extended version of the "relative framework" (initially developed in the context of algebraic topology by R. Bott and L. W. Tu in the 1980s to deal with boundaries) and the variational bicomplex framework (the differential geometric arena for the variational calculus). The relative bicomplex framework is the natural one to deal with field theories with boundary contributions, including corner contributions. In fact, we prove a formal equivalence between the relative version of a theory with boundary and the nonrelative version of the same theory with no boundary. With these tools at hand, we endow the space of solutions of the theory with a (pre)symplectic structure canonically associated with the action and which, in general, has boundary contributions. We also study the symmetries of the theory and construct, for a large group of them, their Noether currents, and charges. Moreover, we completely characterize the arbitrariness (or lack thereof for fiber bundles with contractible fibers) of these constructions. This clarifies many misconceptions about the role of the boundary terms in the CPS description of a field theory. Finally, we provide what we call the CPS-algorithm to construct the aforementioned (pre)symplectic structure and apply it to some relevant examples.43eng© 2021 American Physical SocietyClassical solutions in field theoryGauge theoriesGravitationClassical black holesSpacetime symmetriesSymmetriesGeometryMathematical physics methodsresearch articleMatemáticashttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.025011open access1243Physical Review D103AR/0000026674