Problems with extending conclusions between Bowman's paradox and Beta's death

e-Archivo Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cano Rodríguez, Manuel
dc.contributor.author Núñez-Nickel, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned 2006-11-07T09:37:07Z
dc.date.available 2006-11-07T09:37:07Z
dc.date.issued 2002-10
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10016/73
dc.description.abstract This issue of Omega contains a commentary by P.L. Brockett, W.W. Cooper, K.H. Kwon, and T.W. Ruefli on the review of Bowman's paradox by Nickel and Rodríguez, published in the February 2002 issue of Omega. In their commentary, the authors describe an article, published in the 1992 issue of Decision Sciences but not covered by the review, and claim that they had previously overcome three of the outstanding problems noted in Nickel and Rodríguez's review. This reply to the commentary proves that the conclusions drawn in the review by Nickel and Rodríguez are relevant in spite of the Brockett et al. arguments against them. In this reply, we show that the paper by Brockett et al. neither explains Bowman's paradox nor resolves its underlying problems. First, the definitions of risk and return measures are mathematically linked, and second, a cross-sectional methodology is used. We also provide our opinion on what would be necessary to bear in mind in order to extend any conclusion from Bowman's paradox to beta's death and vice versa.
dc.format.extent 1126570 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workings Paper. Bussiness Economics
dc.relation.ispartofseries 2002-19
dc.title Problems with extending conclusions between Bowman's paradox and Beta's death
dc.type workingPaper
dc.subject.eciencia Empresa
dc.rights.accessRights openAccess
dc.identifier.repec wb024919
 Find Full text

Files in this item

*Click on file's image for preview. (Embargoed files's preview is not supported)


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record