Editor:
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Ciencia Política y Sociología. Área de Ciencia Política y de la Administración Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto de Política y Gobernanza
Fecha de edición:
2006
ISSN:
1698-482X
Revisado:
PeerReviewed
Serie/Num.:
Documentos de Trabajo. Política y Gestión 7/2006
Palabras clave:
Actores (Ciencias sociales)
,
Ciencia política
,
Definición
,
Participación social
Derechos:
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Resumen:
The concept of actor is widely employed in social sciences
as well as in politicians and journalists’ discourse. That is why it is
so striking the lack of definitions. We assume that this concept must
be defined in operational terms so that can orientate boThe concept of actor is widely employed in social sciences
as well as in politicians and journalists’ discourse. That is why it is
so striking the lack of definitions. We assume that this concept must
be defined in operational terms so that can orientate both theoretical
analysis and empirical research. By examining the academic debates
on this subject, we propose a definition of the term that serves to
determine when an individual or a group of individuals can be
considered as actors. Based on this, we make a distinction between
two main types of collective actors -nominal actors and collective
actors. Since actions and/or decisions are in the core of the concept,
we conclude focusing on those factors that have an impact upon
actors’ actions and decisions.[+][-]