Does the representation of household behavior matter for welfare analysis of tax-benefit policies? : an introduction

e-Archivo Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bargain, Olivier
dc.contributor.author Beblo, Miriam
dc.contributor.author Beninger, Denis
dc.contributor.author Blundell, Richard
dc.contributor.author Carrasco, Raquel
dc.contributor.author Chiuri, Maria-Concetta
dc.contributor.author Laisney, François
dc.contributor.author Lechene, Valérie
dc.contributor.author Moreau, Nicolas
dc.contributor.author Myck, Michal
dc.contributor.author Ruiz-Castillo, Javier
dc.contributor.author Vermeulen, Frederic
dc.date.accessioned 2009-11-23T16:00:26Z
dc.date.available 2009-11-23T16:00:26Z
dc.date.issued 2006-05
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation Review of the Economics of the Household, 2006, v. 4, n. 2, pp. 99-111
dc.identifier.issn 1573-7152
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10016/4734
dc.description.abstract A widely shared intuition holds that individual control over money matters for the decision process within the household and the subsequent distribution of resources and welfare. As a consequence, there are good reasons to depart from the unitary model of the household and to explore the possibilities offered by models of the family accounting for several decision makers in the household and for the potential impact of tax reforms on the balance of power. This paper summarizes both the methodological and empirical findings presented in the next three papers of this special issue of the Review of the Economics of the Household. This series of contributions primarily entails a concrete comparison of the policy implications of the choice between the unitary and a particular multi-person representation: the collective representation. On the one hand, it suggests a methodology to implement the collective model of labor supply in a realistic context where participation is modeled together with working hours, and where the full tax-benefit system is accounted for. On the other hand, the empirical part relies on comprehensive simulations of tax reforms in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, and allows to quantify the distortions that may affect policy recommendations based on the unitary model.
dc.format.mimetype text/plain
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Springer
dc.rights ©Springer
dc.subject.other Collective model
dc.subject.other Household labor supply
dc.subject.other Intra household allocations
dc.subject.other Tax reform
dc.title Does the representation of household behavior matter for welfare analysis of tax-benefit policies? : an introduction
dc.type article
dc.type.review PeerReviewed
dc.description.status Publicado
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11150-006-0001-8
dc.subject.jel D11
dc.subject.jel D12
dc.subject.jel D22
dc.subject.eciencia Economía
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11150-006-0001-8
dc.rights.accessRights openAccess
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage 99
dc.identifier.publicationissue 2
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage 111
dc.identifier.publicationtitle Review of the Economics of the Household
dc.identifier.publicationvolume 4
 Find Full text

Files in this item

*Click on file's image for preview. (Embargoed files's preview is not supported)


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record