Cita:
Guillamon-Saorin, E., Isidro, H., & Marques, A. (2017). Impression Management and Non-GAAP Disclosure in Earnings Announcements. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44 (3-4), pp. 448-479 .
Patrocinador:
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España) Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España) Comunidad de Madrid
Agradecimientos:
This study was supported by the Foundation
for Science and Technology in Portugal (grant PTDC/EGE-GES/103770/2008). Encarna Guillamon-
Saorin acknowledges financial contribution from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (SEJ2007-
67582-C02-02/ECON, ECO2010-19314), Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (2014/00452/001) and
Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid (SEJ2008-00059-003). Ana Marques also acknowledges financial support
received from Nova Forum.
Proyecto:
Gobierno de España. ECO2010-19314 Gobierno de España. ECO2013-48328-C3-3-P Gobierno de España. SEJ2007-67582-C02-02 Comunidad de Madrid. SEJ2008-00059-003
Palabras clave:
Pro forma earnings
,
Alternative performance measures
,
Street earnings
,
Disclosure tone
,
Emphasis
,
Sophisticated investors
,
Shareholder protection
We study the market's reaction to the disclosure of non-GAAP earnings measures that are combined with high impression management. We construct an impression management score that captures several communication techniques that managers often use to positively bWe study the market's reaction to the disclosure of non-GAAP earnings measures that are combined with high impression management. We construct an impression management score that captures several communication techniques that managers often use to positively bias investors’ perceptions of firm performance. We hand-collect and code both quantitative and qualitative information from earnings announcement press releases of large European firms. Our results indicate that non-GAAP measures are informative to capital markets. However, non-GAAP adjustments are more persistent when accompanied by higher levels of impression management. This evidence is consistent with managers attempting to distort users’ perceptions when non-GAAP adjustments are of lower quality. Market reaction tests suggest that investors are able to see through managers’ intentions and discount non-GAAP information that is accompanied by high impression management. Moreover, investors in more sophisticated markets penalize non-GAAP measures communicated with high impression management. Our results are robust to a battery of sensitivity tests, including the use of a machine-coded tone measure.[+][-]