xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-contributor-funder:
European Commission
Sponsor:
This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 768583- RECODE project (Recycling carbon dioxide in the cement
industry to produce added-value additives: a step towards a CO2 circular
economy, https://www.recodeh2020.eu/). This paper reflects only the
author's view and the content is the sole responsibility of the authors.
The European Commission or its services cannot be held responsible for
any use that may be made of the information it contains.
CaCO3 nanoparticles as filler have received considerable attention for the mechanical improvement that they
provide to cements. However, their life-cycle impact on the environment remains almost unexplored, even if the
cement industry is considered one of thCaCO3 nanoparticles as filler have received considerable attention for the mechanical improvement that they
provide to cements. However, their life-cycle impact on the environment remains almost unexplored, even if the
cement industry is considered one of the largest CO2 emitters. In this perspective, this research work assessed a
novel method for using CO2 from cement flue gases to produce nanoCaCO3 as cement filler within the cradle to
cradle thinking. For this purpose, two routes of CO2 capture were assessed followed by the study of the synthesis
of CaCO3 through a mineral carbonation. Three scenarios for the synthesis of CaCO3 nanoparticles were assessed
targeting the use of waste or by-products as raw materials and recirculation of them to reduce any kind of
emission. The three scenarios were evaluated by means of the Life Cycle Assessment methodology. Once the best
considered route for nanoCaCO3 production was determined, this research work examined the environmental
effect of including 2 wt% of CaCO3 nanoparticles into the cement. Closing the loop follows a circular economy
approach since the CO2 is captured within the same cement factory. The results were compared with conventional
Portland cement. Regarding nanoCaCO3 results, the scenario with simultaneous production of NH4Cl, and
using as calcium source CaCl2 deriving from the soda ash Solvay process, proved to be the best option. Moreover,
when cement was filled with 2 wt% of this nanoCaCO3, the benefit in terms of emission reductions in the Climate
Change category was higher than 60 % compared to the conventional Portland cement.[+][-]