Patterns of team adaptation: The effects of behavioural interaction patterns on team adaptation and the antecedent effect of empowering versus directive leadership
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Patterns of team adaptation: The effects of behavioural interaction patterns on team adaptation and the antecedent effect of empowering versus directive leadership
Citation:
Rico, R., Uitdewilligen, S. G., & Dorta, D. (2021). Patterns of team adaptation: The effects of behavioural interaction patterns on team adaptation and the antecedent effect of empowering versus directive leadership. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 1–14
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-contributor-funder:
Comunidad de Madrid. Conserjería de Educación e Investigación Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España) Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Sponsor:
Comunidad de Madrid (Programa Excelencia
para el Profesorado Universitario, convenio
con Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, V Plan
Regional de Investigación Científica e
Innovación Tecnológica),
Grant/Award Number: EPUC3M12; Spanish
National Plan for R&D, Ministry of Economy
and Competitiveness, Grant/Award Numbers:
PSI2012‐31135, R. Rico, Principal Researcher
Project:
Comunidad de Madrid. EPUC3M12 Gobierno de España. PSI2012‐31135,
Keywords:
Directive leadership
,
Empowering leadership
,
Magnitude of change
,
Team adaptation
,
Team behavioural interaction patterns
In this study, we analysed the effects of team leadership style and magnitude of
change on team behavioural interaction patterns (TBIPs) and performance in teams
coping with unexpected task changes. Sixty‐seven 3‐person teams took part in a
computer‐based fIn this study, we analysed the effects of team leadership style and magnitude of
change on team behavioural interaction patterns (TBIPs) and performance in teams
coping with unexpected task changes. Sixty‐seven 3‐person teams took part in a
computer‐based fire‐fighting simulation task and were randomly assigned to one of
the four conditions resulting from our 2 (leadership style: directive vs. empowering)
× 2 (magnitude of change: high vs. low) longitudinal factorial design. Our results
showed that empowering‐led teams tend to display more TBIPs than directive‐led
teams. Through discontinuous random coefficient growth modelling, we observed
that prechange TBIPs negatively affect teams' transition adaptation. However,
postchange TBIPs were beneficial for teams' reacquisition adaptation. Implications
for theory and practice are discussed.[+][-]