Citation:
Laporte-Azcué, M., González-Gómez, P., Rodríguez-Sánchez, M. & Santana, D. (2021). Material selection for solar central receiver tubes. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 231, 111317.
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-contributor-funder:
Comunidad de Madrid Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España) Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (España) Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Sponsor:
This research is partially funded by the scholarship "Ayudas para la formación del profesorado universitario" [grant number FPU-02361] awarded by the Spanish Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (MECD), the Spanish government under the project RTI2018-096664-B-C21 (MICINN/FEDER, UE) and the call "Programa de apoyo a la realización de proyectos interdisciplinares de I+D para jóvenes investigadores de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid 2019-2020", under the projects RETOrenovable-CM-UC3M [grant number 2020/00034/001] and ZEROGASPAIN-CM-UC3M [grant number 2020/00033/001], funded on the frame of the Convenio Plurianual Comunidad de Madrid- Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
Project:
Gobierno de España. RTI2018-096664-B-C21 Comunidad de Madrid. ZEROGASPAIN-CM-UC3M Comunidad de Madrid. RETOrenovable-CM-UC3M Gobierno de España. FPU-02361
Keywords:
External tubular receiver
,
Receiver lifetime
,
Levelized cost of alloys
,
Tube material selection
The severe operation conditions and great capital investment of solar power tower central receivers motivate the lifetime analysis of a molten-salt external-cylindrical-tubular receiver, considering five alloy alternatives for its tubes manufacturing: Haynes 2The severe operation conditions and great capital investment of solar power tower central receivers motivate the lifetime analysis of a molten-salt external-cylindrical-tubular receiver, considering five alloy alternatives for its tubes manufacturing: Haynes 230, alloy 316H, Inconel 625, 740H and 800H. An analytical low-computational cost methodology is employed, considering the temperature dependence of tube material properties, elastic-plastic stresses/strains and stress relaxation. Thus, creep and fatigue experimental data available in the literature for these alloys are compiled in this work, providing the coefficients required for the methodology followed.
A great alloys operation limitation is the film temperature to avoid corrosion issues; the most permissive are H230, 740H and 800H (650 °C), followed by Inconel 625 (630 °C) and 316H (600 °C). This, and the twice the yield strength, is regarded to set the heliostat field aiming strategy as equatorial as possible for each alloy, resulting in great power production divergences: 24% and 65% less for 625 and alloy 316H receivers with respect to the 740H receiver. Then, the lifetime analysis for a clear design day operation, representative of the receiver during ideal operation, is performed. The stress relaxation regard becomes critical for the accurate damage prediction; alloys 316H and 800H show stress reset during operation, not benefitting from a global stress relaxation. Thus, 800H exhibits a poor endurance. For the clear-day assumption, 740H shows the best lifetime and costs/power performance; the levelized cost of alloy of H230, 625 and alloy 316H is 0.01, 0.09 and over 0.25, respectively, with respect to 740H.[+][-]