Publication: La elección implícita de ley en el Reglamento europeo de sucesiones
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
2019-12-01
Defense date
Authors
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Thomson Reuters
Impact
Export
Abstract
El Reglamento (UE) 650/2012 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 4 julio 2012 relativo a la competencia, la ley aplicable, el reconocimiento y la ejecución de las resoluciones, a la aceptación y la ejecución de los documentos públicos en materia de sucesiones mortis causa y a la creación de un certificado sucesorio europeo constituye la norma central del Derecho europeo en la regulación de esta materia. Como novedad más importante, en materia de Derecho aplicable, se contempla la professio iuris limitada: art. 22. Por ello, en realidad, el primer punto de conexión no es la autonomía de la voluntad del causante, sino su nacionalidad, bien en el momento de su fallecimiento, bien en el momento de la elección de ley. El Reglamento sucesorio admite junto a la posibilidad ordinaria de una professio iuris redactada expresamente "en la forma de una disposición por causa de muerte", la posibilidad de una professio tácita, o resultante sólo implícitamente "de los términos de tales disposiciones". Los problemas de prueba que resultan de esta voluntad tácita y las consecuencias jurídicas en la determinación de la ley aplicable a la sucesión internacional son el objeto principal de este trabajo.
The Regulation (EU) 650/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession constitutes the central norm of European Law in the regulation of this matter. As a more important novelty, in terms of applicable law, professio iuris limitada is contemplated: art. 22. Therefore, in reality, the first point of connection is not the autonomy of the will of the deceased, but his nationality, either at the time of his death, or at the time of the choice of law. The Regulation 650/2012 admits, together with the ordinary possibility of a professio iuris expressly drafted "in a declaration in the form of a disposition of property upon death”, the possibility of a tacit professio, or demonstrated “by the terms of such a disposition”. The problems of proof that result from this tacit will and the legal consequences in determining the law applicable to international succession are the main object of this work.
The Regulation (EU) 650/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession constitutes the central norm of European Law in the regulation of this matter. As a more important novelty, in terms of applicable law, professio iuris limitada is contemplated: art. 22. Therefore, in reality, the first point of connection is not the autonomy of the will of the deceased, but his nationality, either at the time of his death, or at the time of the choice of law. The Regulation 650/2012 admits, together with the ordinary possibility of a professio iuris expressly drafted "in a declaration in the form of a disposition of property upon death”, the possibility of a tacit professio, or demonstrated “by the terms of such a disposition”. The problems of proof that result from this tacit will and the legal consequences in determining the law applicable to international succession are the main object of this work.
Description
Keywords
Reglamento (Ue) 650/2012, Ley aplicable a la sucesión, Sumisión expresa, Sumisión tácita, Regulation (EU) 650/2012, Choice of law In matter of succession, Expressly choice of law, Implicit choice of law
Bibliographic citation
Castellanos Ruiz, E. (2019). La elección implícita de ley en el Reglamento europeo de sucesiones. Revista de derecho patrimonial, 50, pp. 1-22