Citation:
Mandalari, A. M., Lutu, A., Briscoe, B., Bagnulo, M. & Alay, O. (2018). Measuring ECN++: Good News for ++, Bad News for ECN over Mobile. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(3), 180–186.
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-contributor-funder:
European Commission Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España)
Sponsor:
The work of Anna Maria Mandalari has been funded by the EU FP7 METRICS (607728) project. The work of Marcelo Bagnulo has been performed in the framework of the H2020-ICT-2014-2 project 5G NORMA and the 5G-City project funded by MINECO. This work was partially supported by the EU H2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 644399 (MONROE) and grant agreement No. 688421 (MAMI).
Project:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/PITN-GA-2013-607728 Gobierno de España. TEC2016-76795-C6-3-R info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/GA-644399 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/GA-688421
After ECN was first added to IP in 2001, it was hit by a succession of deployment problems. Studies in recent years have concluded that path traversal of ECN has become close to universal. In this article, we test whether the performance enhancement called ECNAfter ECN was first added to IP in 2001, it was hit by a succession of deployment problems. Studies in recent years have concluded that path traversal of ECN has become close to universal. In this article, we test whether the performance enhancement called ECN++ will face a similar deployment struggle as did base ECN. For this, we assess the feasibility of ECN++ deployment over mobile as well as fixed networks. In the process, we discover bad news for the base ECN protocol: contrary to accepted beliefs, more than half the mobile carriers we tested wipe the ECN field at the first upstream hop. All packets still get through, and congestion control still functions, just without the benefits of ECN. This throws into question whether previous studies used representative vantage points. This article also reports the good news that, wherever ECN gets through, we found no deployment problems for the "++" enhancement to ECN. The article includes the results of other in-depth tests that check whether servers that claim to support ECN actually respond correctly to explicit congestion feedback. Those interested can access the raw measurement data online.[+][-]