Rights:
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Abstract:
After atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter is the most common atrial tachyarrhythmia. Its
diagnosis relies on the twelve lead electrocadriogram analysis of the distinctive waves
in several leads. Nonetheless, the accurate identification of the type of atrial After atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter is the most common atrial tachyarrhythmia. Its
diagnosis relies on the twelve lead electrocadriogram analysis of the distinctive waves
in several leads. Nonetheless, the accurate identification of the type of atrial flutter still
requires an invasive procedure. The maneuver for healing atrial flutter consists on ablating
a section of the anatomy of the atria, to stop the macroreentrant circuit to keep
happening, allowing the signal to travel to the ventricles in stead of staying at the atria.
The region to ablate directly depends on the place at which the macroreentrant circuit
is located, which at the same time depends on the type of atrial flutter. Being able to noninvasively
detect the atrial flutter variant would produce a great advantage when healing
this illness. The hypothesis stated at this dissertation is based on the slow conduction
regions as the key factor to distinguish the atrial flutter class. This and unveiling further
relations between cardiac illnesses and their signal’s alter ego are the purpose of this
research project.
With such aim, different methods are developed based on the vectorcardiographic
representation of electrocardiograms from patients suffering from different atrial flutter
types. These methods consist on the characterisation of vectorcardiographic signals from
different standpoints. Besides, a mathematical model is implemented to create a large
database with synthetic vectorcardiographic signals allowing to test the validity of the
utilised methods.
The results prove the importance of slow regions in the vectorcardiographic representation
of the patient’s signals to characterise the atrial flutter type non-invasively.
Furthermore, the analysis of the outcome of the different methods reveal a wide variety
of features relating characteristics of the vectorcardiographic signal to the anatomy
and physiology of this cardiac disease. Hence, not only results supporting the hypothesis
were successful (taking into account some limitations), but also a variegated assortment
of results unmasked remarkable relations among the vectorcardiographic signal and the
characteristics of the atrial flutter disease.[+][-]