Multicamera Optical Tracker Assessment for Computer Aided Surgery Applications

e-Archivo Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Marinetto Carrillo, Eugenio Daniel
dc.contributor.author García Mato, David
dc.contributor.author Garcia, Alonso
dc.contributor.author Martínez de la Casa Díaz, Santiago
dc.contributor.author Desco Menéndez, Manuel
dc.contributor.author Pascau González-Garzón, Javier
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-26T11:18:55Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-26T11:18:55Z
dc.date.issued 2018-10-26
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation Marinetto, E., Garcia-Mato, D., Garcia, A., Martinez, S., Desco, M. & Pascau, J. (2018). Multicamera Optical Tracker Assessment for Computer Aided Surgery Applications. IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 64359–64370.
dc.identifier.issn 2169-3536
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10016/32762
dc.description.abstract Image-guided interventions enable the surgeon to display the position of instruments and devices with respect to the patient's imaging studies during surgery by means of a tracker device. Optical trackers are commonly chosen for many surgical applications when high accuracy and robustness are required. OptiTrack is a multicamera optical tracker whose number of sensors and their spatial configuration can be adapted to the application requirements, making it suitable for surgical settings. Nonetheless, no extensive studies of its accuracy are available. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate an eight-camera optical tracker in terms of accuracy, miscalibration sensitivity, camera occlusions, and tool detection in a feasible clinical setup. We studied the tracking accuracy of the system using a robotic arm (~μm precision) as the gold standard, a single reflective marker, and various tracked objects while the system was installed in an operating room. Miscalibration sensitivity was 0.16°. Mean target error was 0.24 mm for a single marker, decreasing to 0.05 mm for tracked tools. Single-marker error increased up to 1.65 mm when five cameras where occluded although 75% of the working volume showed an error lower than 0.23 mm. The accuracy was sufficient for navigating the collimator in intraoperative electron radiation therapy, improving redundancy and allowing large-working volumes. The tracker assessment we present and the validated miscalibration protocol are important contributions to image-guided surgery, where the choice of the tracker is critical and the knowledge of the accuracy in situations of camera occlusion is mandatory during surgical navigation.
dc.format.extent 22
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher IEEE
dc.rights © 2018, IEEE
dc.subject.other Computer aided interventions
dc.subject.other Infrared tracking
dc.subject.other Multicamera optical tracker
dc.subject.other Optical tracking
dc.title Multicamera Optical Tracker Assessment for Computer Aided Surgery Applications
dc.type article
dc.subject.eciencia Ingeniería Naval
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2878323
dc.rights.accessRights openAccess
dc.relation.projectID Gobierno de España. TEC2013-48251-C2-1-R
dc.relation.projectID Comunidad de Madrid. S2013/MIT-3024
dc.relation.projectID Gobierno de España. PI15/02121
dc.relation.projectID Gobierno de España. PI18/01625
dc.type.version acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage 64359
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage 64370
dc.identifier.publicationtitle IEEE Access
dc.identifier.publicationvolume 6
dc.identifier.uxxi AR/0000022817
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España)
dc.contributor.funder Comunidad de Madrid
dc.affiliation.dpto UC3M. Departamento de Bioingeniería
dc.affiliation.grupoinv UC3M. Grupo de Investigación: Biomedical Imaging and Instrumentation Group
dc.affiliation.grupoinv UC3M. Grupo de Investigación: BSEL - Laboratorio de Ciencia e Ingeniería Biomédica
 Find Full text

Files in this item

*Click on file's image for preview. (Embargoed files's preview is not supported)


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record