Blends of poly(vinylacetate) (PVAc) and poly(cyclohexylmethacrylate) (PCHMA) labeled by copolymerization
with 4-methacryloylamine-48-nitrostilbene (Sb), with (1-pyrenylmethyl)methacrylate
(Py), or with 3-(methacryloylamine)propyl-N-carbazole (Cbz) were prepaBlends of poly(vinylacetate) (PVAc) and poly(cyclohexylmethacrylate) (PCHMA) labeled by copolymerization
with 4-methacryloylamine-48-nitrostilbene (Sb), with (1-pyrenylmethyl)methacrylate
(Py), or with 3-(methacryloylamine)propyl-N-carbazole (Cbz) were prepared by casting dilute solutions
in tetrahydrofurane (THF) or chloroform. Films about 10 mm thick were formed. Phase
separation in two types of domains is observed by transmission optical microscopy (TOM) and
epifluorescence microscopy (EFM): small craters of 1 to 10 mm placed at the polymer–air interface
and larger domains, on the scale of 100 mm. The morphology of samples depends on the composition
of the polymer blend and on solvent. The green fluorescence of Sb, the violet of Py, or the blue
of Cbz provides imaging of the distribution of PCHMA in the different domains and in the matrix.
It is thus observed that (i) superficial craters and large domains are formed mainly by PCHMA and
(ii) the matrix is composed of PVAc in films cast from THF and it is a blend of the two polymers,
homogeneous at the submicrometric scale, for chloroform. The emission intensity of Py, recorded
by microfluorescence spectroscopy (MFS), yields a mapping similar to imaging detection. It is
remarkable that in films cast from chloroform, the smaller domains are distributed with a 2D
hexatic order disrupted by dislocations and disclinations, whereas in films cast from THF, a larger
heterogeneity is found, denoting different mechanisms of solvent evaporation.[+][-]