Editor:
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía
Fecha de edición:
2014-10
ISSN:
2340-5031
Agradecimientos:
Albarrán acknowledges financial support from the Spanish MEC through grants ECO2009-11165 and ECO2011-29751, and Carrasco and Ruiz-Castillo through grants No. ECO2012-31358 and ECO2011-29762, respectively
Serie/Num.:
Working Paper Economic Series 14-14
Proyecto:
Gobierno de España. ECO2012-31358 Gobierno de España. ECO2011-29762 Gobierno de España. ECO2011-29751
Derechos:
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Resumen:
We use a sample consisting of economists working in 2007 in the world top 81 Economics departments, and
Econometric Society Fellows working elsewhere. Productivity is based in each individual’s publications in four
journal equivalent classes. We identify thrWe use a sample consisting of economists working in 2007 in the world top 81 Economics departments, and
Econometric Society Fellows working elsewhere. Productivity is based in each individual’s publications in four
journal equivalent classes. We identify three elites consisting of 123, 332, and 908 researchers in a total sample of
2,605 scholars, which are partitioned into the U.S., the European Union, and the rest of the world. We investigate
the following questions. (1) The “funneling effect” from countries where elite members obtain their first degree, to
countries where they earn a Ph.D., and to countries where they work in 2007. (2) The clustering in a few U.S.
institutions. (3) The distribution into those who study and work in the same country (stayers), those who study their
Ph.D. abroad but come back home to work (brain circulation), and those who migrate after completing their
education at home, plus those who remain abroad after studying the Ph.D. (two forms of brain drain). (4) The
research gap favoring the U.S. (5) The elite in Economics versus other scientific disciplines. (6) We investigate
questions 1 to 4 above for the subset of economists that earned a Ph.D. at most 25 years before 2007[+][-]