Sobre libertad y elecciones : un análisis del ámbito de los límites y las posibilidades del neuroderecho

Abstract

The topic of freedom in the legal courts, at least in the North American context, is treated as a working hypothesis, which was first questioned by philosophy, and defended in the legal scope by theorists and philosophers of law. However, in recent years a new front of uncertainty is emerging, regarding the conduct of human freedom; this time through the neural-scientists. Under neurolaw we understand the field of knowledge which purpose is to explore the findings of neural-scientific justice. This study presents the theme of freedom in the context of the courts of justice in their questionable application of neural-scientific formulations, in order to delimit the extent of their use.