This article revisits Bairoch’s hypothesis that in the late nineteenth century
tariffs were positively associated with growth, as recently confirmed by a
new generation of quantitative studies (see O’Rourke 2000; Jacks 2006;
Clemens and Williamson 2002, 2004).This article revisits Bairoch’s hypothesis that in the late nineteenth century
tariffs were positively associated with growth, as recently confirmed by a
new generation of quantitative studies (see O’Rourke 2000; Jacks 2006;
Clemens and Williamson 2002, 2004). This article highlights the
importance of the structure of protection in the relation between trade
policy and its potential growth-promoting impact. Evidence is based on a
new database on industrial tariffs for the 1870s. The results show that
income, factor endowment and policy independence are important for
explaining regional asymmetries between tariffs and growth. At a global
level, increased protection, measured by total and average tariffs on
manufactures, implied more unskilled inefficient protection and less
growth, and this is especially true for the poor countries in the late
nineteenth century. Protection was only positive for a ‘rich club’ if we
include in this group new settler countries, which grew rapidly in the late
nineteenth century and imposed high tariffs mainly for fiscal reasons[+][-]