Publication:
Is managerial entrenchment always bad and corporate social responsibility always good? A cross¿national examination of their combined influence on shareholder value

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers
Publication date
2020-01-17
Defense date
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
Impact
Google Scholar
Export
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Building on the comparative capitalism's notion of institutional complementarities, we examine whether firms' simultaneous adoption of managerial entrenchment provisions (MEPs) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reinforces or undercuts one another in influencing firm financial performance. We propose that the financial impact of such configurations is contingent on the country's institutional setting. In Liberal Market Economies (LMEs), where firms face strong pressures to achieve short‐term goals, the combination of MEPs and CSR creates shareholder value, particularly when firms engage in internally oriented CSR projects. Conversely, in Coordinated Market Economies (CMEs), where institutions already curb short‐term demands, the combined adoption of MEPs and CSR initiatives destroys shareholder value, particularly when this CSR is external. Overall, our study enhances understanding of the institutional complementarity between corporate governance and CSR.
Description
Keywords
Comparative capitalism, Corporate governance, Corporate social responsibility, Managerial entrenchment, Shareholder value
Bibliographic citation
Surroca, J. A., Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., & Tribó, J. A. (2020). Is managerial entrenchment always bad and corporate social responsibility always good? A cross‐national examination of their combined influence on shareholder value. Strategic Management Journal, 41 (5), pp. 891-920.