Publication:
PET and CT image registration of the rat brain and skull using the air algorithm

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers
ISSN: 1082-3654
ISBN: 0-7803-6503-8
Publication date
2000-10
Defense date
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
IEEE
Impact
Google Scholar
Export
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Spatially registered PET and CT images of the same small animal offer at .least three potential advantages .over PET alone. First, the CT images should' alIow accurate, nearly noise-free correction of the PET image data for attenuation. Second, the CT images snould permit more certain identification of structures evident in the PET images and third, the CT images provide a priori anatomical information that may be of use with resolution-improving image reconstruction algorithms that model the PET imaging process. Thus far, howeyer, image registration algorithms effective in human studies have not been characterized in the small animal setting. Accordingly,'we evaluated the ability of the AIR algorithm to accurately register PET F-18 fluoride and F-18 FDG images of the rat skull and brain, respectively, to CT images acquired following each PET imaging session. The AIR algorithm was able to register the bone-to-bone images with a maximum error of less than 1.0 mm. The registration error for the brain-to-brain study, however, was greater (2.4 mm) and required additional steps and. user.intervention to segment the brail1 from the head in both data sets before registration. These preliminary results suggest that the AIR algorithm can accurately combine PET and CT images in small animals when the data sets are nearly homologous, but may require additional segmentation steps with increased mis-registration errors when registering disparate, low contrast soft tissue structures.
Description
Proceeding of: 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Lyon, France, October 15 - 20, 2000
Keywords
Bibliographic citation
2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Oct. 2000, vol. 3, p. 16/22 - 16/23