Español English Contacte con nosotros http://www.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/biblioteca
DSpace e-Archivo

Archivo Abierto Institucional de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid > Investigación > Departamentos > Departamento de Mecánica de Medios Continuos y Teoría de Estructuras > Grupo de Investigación en Mecánica de Materiales Avanzados > DMMCTE - MMA - Artículos de revista >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10016/7493

Google™ Scholar. Others By: Santiuste, Carlos - Sánchez-Sáez, Sonia - Barbero, Enrique
Files in This Item:
application_barbero_ijss_2007_ps.pdfpostprint version1,07 MBAdobe PDFformato pdf
Title: Application of the flexibility influence function method in the dynamic analysis of composite beams
Author(s): Santiuste, Carlos
Sánchez-Sáez, Sonia
Barbero, Enrique
Publisher: Elsevier
Issued date: Jul-2007
Citation: International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2007, vol. 44, n. 14-15, p. 4795-4809
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10016/7493
ISSN: 0020-7683
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.007
Description: 15 pages, 9 figures.
Abstract: The flexibility influence function technique is validated as a method for calculating the displacements and the rotations of a laminated beam subjected to a dynamic load, using the first-order shear deformation laminate theory and comparing the results with those obtained by modal analysis and two finite element models (one-dimensional and three-dimensional). The movements (displacements and rotations) were calculated from a single-span beam subjected to a time-variable load with four boundary conditions: clamped-clamped, hinged-hinged, clamped-free, clamped-hinged. A carbon/epoxy cross-ply laminated beam was selected to avoid bending-torsion coupling. The maximum movements calculated by the flexibility influence function method differs very little from those calculated with the other two models accounted for by the first-order shear deformation laminate theory: modal analysis and the one-dimensional numerical model. The differences in the rotations between the three-dimensional numerical model and the flexibility influence function method are slightly bigger, and could be due to the warping of the cross-section of the beam, which is not included in the first-order shear deformation laminate theory.
Review: PeerReviewed
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.007
Keywords: Flexibility Influence Function Method
First-order shear deformation theory
Composite laminates
Beam models
Bending
Rights: © Elsevier
Appears in Collections:DMMCTE - MMA - Artículos de revista

Refworks Export

SFX Query

Items in E-Archivo are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! © Universidad Carlos III de Madrid - Software DSpace - Terms of use - Feedback