|
Archivo Abierto Institucional de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid >
Investigación >
Departamentos >
Departamento de Economía >
DE - Working Papers. Economics. WE >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10016/6044
|
Files in This Item:
| we975627.PDF | -- 2009-12-14 -- Available on Internet -- preprint | 964,24 kB | Adobe PDF | |  |
|
| Title: | Bertrand competition, employment rationing and collusion through centralized negotiations |
| Author(s): | Dhillon, Amrita Petrakis, Emmanuel |
| Publisher: | Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía |
| Issued date: | Aug-1997 |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10016/6044 |
| Abstract: | This paper studies the role of employment rationing in a unionized oligopolistic industry. Firms bargain collectively with an industry-wide union, and then compete in preces. Negotiations may be conducted over a bonus scheme which specifies the bonus that each employee receives if firm/industy profits exceed a certain target (or if industry employment does not exceed acertain level). After firmes have chosen prices, they request workers from the union to realize their production plans. The number that each firm actuallly receives depends on the union´s rationing scheme. Firms, by a suitable choice of a bonus scheme, can ensure a collusive outcome in equillibrium. Indeed, firms have ho incentive to deviate from the monopolu price knowing that they would be optimally rationed by the union. |
| Serie / Nº.: | UC3M Working papers. Economics 1997-56-27 |
| Keywords: | Centralized negotiations Bertrand competition Collusion Employment Rationing |
| Appears in Collections: | Economists Online DE - Working Papers. Economics. WE
|
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in E-Archivo are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|