Español English Contacte con nosotros http://www.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/biblioteca
DSpace e-Archivo

Archivo Abierto Institucional de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid > Investigación > Departamentos > Departamento de Informática > Grupo de Computación Evolutiva y Redes Neuronales (EVANNAI) > DI - GCERN - Comunicaciones en Congresos y otros eventos >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10016/4076

Files in This Item:
using-classifiers_CCST_2001.pdf696,03 kBAdobe PDFformato pdf
Title: Using classifiers to predict linear feedback shift registers
Author(s): Hernández, Julio C.
Isasi, Pedro
Sierra, José M.
Mex-Perera, C.
Ramos Álvarez, Benjamín
Publisher: IEEE
Issued date: Oct-2001
Citation: 35th International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, London, October 16-19, 2001, p. 240-249
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10016/4076
ISBN: 0-7803-6636-0
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/.2001.962839
Description: Proceeding of: IEEE 35th International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology. October 16-19, 2001, London
Abstract: Previously (J.C. Hernandez et al., 2000), some new ideas that justify the use of artificial intelligence techniques in cryptanalysis are presented. The main objective of that paper was to show that the theoretical next bit prediction problem can be transformed into a classification problem, and this classification problem could be solved with the aid of some AI algorithms. In particular, they showed how a well-known classifier called c4.5 could predict the next bit generated by a linear feedback shift register (LFSR, a widely used model of pseudorandom number generator) very efficiently and, most importantly, without any previous knowledge over the model used. The authors look for other classifiers, apart from c4.5, that could be useful in the prediction of LFSRs. We conclude that the selection of c4.5 by Hernandez et al. was adequate, because it shows the best accuracy of all the classifiers tested. However, we have found other classifiers that produce interesting results, and we suggest that these algorithms must be taken into account in the future when trying to predict more complex LFSR-based models. Finally, we show some other properties that make the c4.5 algorithm the best choice for this particular cryptanalytic problem.
Review: PeerReviewed
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/.2001.962839
Subject: artificial intelligence
Cryptography
Pattern classification
Shift registers
Rights: © IEEE
Appears in Collections:DI - GCERN - Capítulos de Monografías
DI - GCERN - Comunicaciones en Congresos y otros eventos

Refworks Export

SFX Query

Items in E-Archivo are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! © Universidad Carlos III de Madrid - Software DSpace - Terms of use - Feedback