Publication:
Suicidal altruism under random assortment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers
Publication date
2008
Defense date
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad de Arizona
Impact
Google Scholar
Export
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Questions: Can there be a selective explanation for suicide? Or are all suicides evolutionary mistakes, ever pruned by natural selection to the extent that the tendency to perform them is heritable? Model: A simple variant of trait group selection (where a population is divided into mutually exclusive groups, with the direct effects of behaviour limited to group-mates), employing predators as the mechanism underlying group selection. Predators evaluate groups to avoid potentially suicidal defenders (which, when present, limit a predator’s net return), thus acting as a group selection mechanism favouring groups with potentially suicidal altruists. Conclusion: The model supports contingent strong altruism (depressing one’s direct reproduction – absolute fitness – to aid others) without kin assortment. Even an extreme contingent suicidal type (destroying self for the sake of others) may either saturate a population or be polymorphic with a type avoiding such altruism. The model does not, however, support a sterile worker caste, where sterility occurs before life-history events associated with effective altruism; under random assortment, reproductive suicide must remain contingent or facultative.
Description
Keywords
contingent strong altruism, correlated strategy, predation, random assortment, suicidal altruism, trait group selection, weak altruism
Bibliographic citation
Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2008, vol. 10, p. 1077-1086