Publication: Reflexiones sobre la validez y revocabilidad de la reforma de la Constitución Española producida en 2011
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
2013-01
Defense date
Authors
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto de Derechos Humanos Bartolomé de las Casas; Dykinson
Impact
Export
Abstract
Más allá de la cascada de reacciones políticas acerca de las motivaciones y repercusiones
para la ciudadanía de la reforma constitucional, resulta innegable
que tal medida genera una serie de preguntas de importancia capital en el
ámbito del análisis meramente jurídico ¿Fue constitucionalmente adecuado el
procedimiento empleado para la reforma? ¿En qué medida afecta al resto de
principios, derechos y objetivos constitucionales? ¿Puede decirse que la reforma
desvirtúa el modelo de Estado social y democrático de Derecho que consagra
el artículo 1.1 de la norma fundamental? ¿Hemos perdido la coherencia interna
de nuestro texto constitucional, incluyendo en él contrasentidos lógicamente
incompatibles? ¿Es posible que la reforma sea revocada? En las siguientes líneas
intentaremos dar respuesta a estos interrogantes apoyándonos en la doctrina
constitucional y la filosofía jurídica.
Beyond the waterfall of political reactions it brings over of the motivations and repercussions for the citizenship of the constitutional reform, turns out to be undeniable that such a measure generates a series of questions of cardinal importance in the area of the merely juridical analysis: was the procedure used for the reform constitutionally suitable? In what measure sympathetic on the rest of beginning, rights and constitutional aims? Can it be said that the reform spoils the model of social and democratic State of Law who dedicates the article 1.1 of the fundamental norm? Have we lost the internal coherence of our constitutional text, including in him logically incompatible absurdities? Is it possible that the reform is revoked? In the following lines we will try to give response to these questions resting on the constitutional doctrine and the juridical philosophy.
Beyond the waterfall of political reactions it brings over of the motivations and repercussions for the citizenship of the constitutional reform, turns out to be undeniable that such a measure generates a series of questions of cardinal importance in the area of the merely juridical analysis: was the procedure used for the reform constitutionally suitable? In what measure sympathetic on the rest of beginning, rights and constitutional aims? Can it be said that the reform spoils the model of social and democratic State of Law who dedicates the article 1.1 of the fundamental norm? Have we lost the internal coherence of our constitutional text, including in him logically incompatible absurdities? Is it possible that the reform is revoked? In the following lines we will try to give response to these questions resting on the constitutional doctrine and the juridical philosophy.
Description
Keywords
Reforma, Constitución, Estado social, Derechos fundamentales, Inconstitucionalidad, Reform, Constitution, Social State, Fundamental rights, Unconstitutionality
Bibliographic citation
Derechos y Libertades: revista de filosofía del derecho y derechos humanos, enero 2013, n. 28, pp.