|
Archivo Abierto Institucional de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid >
Investigación >
Departamentos >
Departamento de Historia Económica e Instituciones >
DHEI - Working Papers in Economic History.WH >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10016/15820
|
Files in This Item:
| wp1209.pdf | -- 2012-11-29 -- Available on Internet -- preprint | 609,76 kB | Adobe PDF | |  |
|
| Title: | Coping with regional inequality in Sweden : structural change, migrations and policy, 1860-2000 |
| Author(s): | Enflo, Kerstin Rosés, Joan R. [jroses] |
| Publisher: | Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Historia Económica e Instituciones |
| Issued date: | Oct-2012 |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10016/15820 |
| Abstract: | In many countries, regional income inequality has followed an inverted Ushaped curve, growing during industrialisation and market integration and declining thereafter. By contrast, Sweden’s regional inequality dropped from 1860 to 1980 and did not show this U-shaped pattern. Accordingly, today’s regional income inequality in Sweden is lower than in other European countries. We note that the prime mover behind the long-run reduction in regional income differentials was structural change, whereas neo-classical and technological forces played a relatively less important role. However, this process of regional income convergence can be divided into two major periods. During the first period (1860-1940), the unrestricted action of market forces, particularly the expansion of markets and high rates of internal and international migrations, led to the compression of regional income differentials. In the subsequent period (1940-2000), the intended intervention of successive governments appears to have also been important for the evolution of regional income inequality. Regional convergence was intense from 1940 to 1980. In this period, governments aided the convergence in productivity among industries and the reallocation of the workforce from the declining to the thriving regions and economic sectors. During the next period (1980-2000), when regional incomes diverged, governments subsidised firms and people in the declining areas. |
| Sponsor: | Financial support from the donors of the International Special Fellowship at Lund University School of Economics and Management is gratefully acknowledged (Visiting Fellows Program 2). Rosés also acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (project no. ECO2009- 13331-C02-01. Enflo also gratefully acknowledges funding from the Swedish Research Council (project no. 2008-2023) and from the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius foundation (project no W2008-0357:1) |
| Serie / Nº.: | Working papers in economic history 12-09 |
| Project: | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/225342 |
| Keywords: | Convergence Regional policy Neo-classical growth model Labour reallocation |
| JEL Classification: | N94 N93 R11 R12 |
| Appears in Collections: | OpenAIRE: Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe Economists Online DHEI - Working Papers in Economic History.WH
|
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in E-Archivo are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|