Assessing the fidelity of COTS 802.11 sniffers

Abstract

Recent measurement studies have analyzed WLAN performance by means of wireless sniffers that passively capture transmitted frames. Also, for relatively large (enterprise) WLAN scenarios, previous work has investigated multi-sniffer deployments with devices placed far apart in order to capture all traffic in the network (even frames transmitted simultaneously by different nodes at non-interfering locations). However, for both these single- and multi-sniffer scenarios, little attention has been given to the fidelity of an individual device, i.e., the ability of a given sniffer to capture all frames that could have been captured by a more faithful device. We assess this fidelity (a term we make precise in this paper) by running controlled experiments inside an anechoic chamber and analyzing the similarities and differences between the trace file from the device under study and those of additional "shadow" devices placed in its close proximity. Our results show that fidelity varies significantly across sniffers, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and that performance may also depend on the nature of the experiment under study and on slight changes of the sniffer position.