Español English Contacte con nosotros http://www.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/biblioteca
DSpace e-Archivo

Archivo Abierto Institucional de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid > Investigación > Departamentos > Departamento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial: Bioingeniería > DBIAB - Book Chapters >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10016/12239

Files in This Item:
normalization_IEEE_2006_ps.pdf1,22 MBAdobe PDFformato pdf
Title: Normalization in 3D PET: dependence on the activity distribution of the source
Author(s): Vicente, Esther
Vaquero, Juan José
España, Samuel
Herraiz, J. L.
Udías, José Manuel
Desco, Manuel
Publisher: IEEE
Issued date: 2007
Citation: 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2006, vol. 4, p. 2206 - 2209
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10016/12239
ISBN: 1-4244-0560-2
ISSN: 1082-3654
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2006.354352
Description: Proceeding of: 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, San Diego, CA, Oct. 29 - Nov. 1, 2006
Abstract: In this communication we show the dependence of the normalization of 3D small animal PET scanners on the calibrating source geometry and non-uniformity of the activity distribution inside it. The potential impact on the reconstructed images of deviations from the ideal activity is discussed. Results from simulated and real data for a pair of block detectors suggest that planar or annular sources can be equally suitable for a normalization procedure if their geometry and their intersections with the system lines-of-response (LORs) are properly taken into account. When comparing an annulus with a centered planar source, both filled with the same total activity, the planar source produces twice the count rate with a 92% of trues versus 66% of trues for the annulus. Scatter and randoms are lower by factors of 3 and 4 respectively in the planar case. We conclude that, although planar and annular sources can be suitable for a normalization procedure if their geometries are properly taken into account, planar source normalization results are better than those of an annulus, particularly if the normalization does not consider the effect of scatter correction, more significant for the annulus source than for the planar one
Sponsor: This work has been partially funded by projects PI052583 and PI052583 (Ministerio de Sanidad), BFM2003-04147-C02-01 (Ministerio de Edcucación y Ciencia) and CD-TEAM (Ministerio de Industria, CENIT program), Spain
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2006.354352
Rights: © IEEE
Appears in Collections:DBIAB - Proceedings
DBIAB - Book Chapters

Refworks Export

SFX Query

Items in E-Archivo are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! © Universidad Carlos III de Madrid - Software DSpace - Terms of use - Feedback