Publication:
First: fast iterative reconstruction software for (PET) tomography

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers
ISSN: 0031-9155 (Print)
ISSN: 1361-6560 (Online)
Publication date
2006
Defense date
Advisors
Tutors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Institute of Physics
Impact
Google Scholar
Export
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Small animal PET scanners require high spatial resolution and good sensitivity. To reconstruct high-resolution images in 3D-PET, iterative methods, such as OSEM, are superior to analytical reconstruction algorithms, although their high computational cost is still a serious drawback. The higher performance of modern computers could make iterative image reconstruction fast enough to be viable, provided we are able to deal with the large number of probability coefficients for the system response matrix in high-resolution PET scanners, which is a difficult task that prevents the algorithms from reaching peak computing performance. Considering all possible axial and in-plane symmetries, as well as certain quasi-symmetries, we have been able to reduce the memory requirements to store the system response matrix (SRM) well below 1 GB, which allows us to keep the whole response matrix of the system inside RAM of ordinary industry-standard computers, so that the reconstruction algorithm can achieve near peak performance. The elements of the SRM are stored as cubic spline profiles and matched to voxel size during reconstruction. In this way, the advantages of ‘on-the-fly’ calculation and of fully stored SRM are combined. The on-the-fly part of the calculation (matching the profile functions to voxel size) of the SRM accounts for 10–30% of the reconstruction time, depending on the number of voxels chosen. We tested our approach with real data from a commercial small animal PET scanner. The results (image quality and reconstruction time) show that the proposed technique is a feasible solution
Description
Keywords
Bibliographic citation
Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2006, vol. 51, n. 18, p. 4547-4565