<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10016/10257">
    <title>E-Archivo Collection: Documentos resultantes de proyectos de investigación financiados por el Séptimo Programa Marco de la Unión Europea</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10016/10257</link>
    <description>Documentos resultantes de proyectos de investigación financiados por el Séptimo Programa Marco de la Unión Europea</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10016/14527" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10016/16138" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10016/16021" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10016/15820" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-06-19T05:18:47Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10016/14527">
    <title>The evolution of the scientific productivity of highly productive economist</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10016/14527</link>
    <description>Title: The evolution of the scientific productivity of highly productive economist
Author(s): Carrasco, Raquel [rcarras]; Ruiz-Castillo, Javier [jrc]
Abstract: This paper studies the evolution of research productivity of a sample of economists working in the best 81 departments in the world in 2007. The main novelty is that, in so far as a productivity distribution can be identified with an income distribution, we measure productivity mobility in a dynamic context using an indicator inspired in an income mobility index suggested by Fields (2010) for a two-period world. Productivity is measured in terms of the number of publications in each of four classes, weighted according to a rather elitist scheme. We study the evolution of average productivity, productivity inequality, the extent of rank reversals, and productivity mobility for seven cohorts, as well as the population as a whole. We offer new evidence confirming previous results about the heterogeneity of the evolution of productivity for top and other researchers. However, the major result is that –contrary to what was expected– for our sample of very highly productive scholars the effect of rank reversals between the two periods on overall productivity mobility offsets the effect of an increase in productivity inequality from the first to the second period in the youngest five out of seven cohorts
Description: This is the third version of a paper with the same title published in this series in June 2012</description>
    <dc:date>2012-09-30T22:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10016/16138">
    <title>World human development : 1870-2007</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10016/16138</link>
    <description>Title: World human development : 1870-2007
Author(s): Prados de la Escosura, Leandro [prados]
Abstract: How has wellbeing evolved over time and across regions? How does the West compare to the Rest? What explains their differences? These questions are addressed using an historical index of human development. A sustained improvement in wellbeing has taken place since 1870. The absolute gap between OECD and the Rest widened over time, but an incomplete catching up –largely explained by education- has occurred since 1913 but fading away after 1970, when the Rest fell behind the OECD in terms of longevity. As the health transition was achieved in the Rest, the contribution of life expectancy to human development improvement declined. Meanwhile, in the OECD, as longevity increased, healthy years expanded. A large variance in human development is noticeable in the Rest since 1970, with East Asia, Latin America and North Africa catching up to the OECD, while Central and Eastern Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa falling behind</description>
    <dc:date>2012-12-31T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10016/16021">
    <title>Multiplicative and fractional strategies when journals are assigned to several subfields</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10016/16021</link>
    <description>Title: Multiplicative and fractional strategies when journals are assigned to several subfields
Author(s): Herranz, Neus; Ruiz-Castillo, Javier [jrc]
Abstract: In many data sets, articles are classified into subfields through the journals in which they have been published. The problem is that while many journals are assigned to a single subfield, many others are assigned to several. This article discusses a multiplicative and a fractional strategy to deal with this situation. The empirical part studies different aspects of citation distributions under the two strategies, namely: the number of articles, the mean citation rate, the broad shape of the distribution, their characterization in terms of size- and scale-invariant indicators of high and low impact, and the presence of extreme distributions, that is, distributions that behave very differently from the rest. We found that, despite large differences in the number of articles according to both strategies, the similarity of the citation characteristics of articles published in journals assigned to one or several subfields guarantees that choosing one of the two strategies may not lead to a radically different picture in practical applications. Nevertheless, the characterization of citation excellence through a high-impact indicator may considerably differ depending on that choice</description>
    <dc:date>2012-10-31T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10016/15820">
    <title>Coping with regional inequality in Sweden : structural change, migrations and policy, 1860-2000</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10016/15820</link>
    <description>Title: Coping with regional inequality in Sweden : structural change, migrations and policy, 1860-2000
Author(s): Enflo, Kerstin; Rosés, Joan R. [jroses]
Abstract: In many countries, regional income inequality has followed an inverted Ushaped curve, growing during industrialisation and market integration and declining thereafter. By contrast, Sweden’s regional inequality dropped from 1860 to 1980 and did not show this U-shaped pattern. Accordingly, today’s regional income inequality in Sweden is lower than in other European countries. We note that the prime mover behind the long-run reduction in regional income differentials was structural change, whereas neo-classical and technological forces played a relatively less important role. However, this process of regional income convergence can be divided into two major periods. During the first period (1860-1940), the unrestricted action of market forces, particularly the expansion of markets and high rates of internal and international migrations, led to the compression of regional income differentials. In the subsequent period (1940-2000), the intended intervention of successive governments appears to have also been important for the evolution of regional income inequality. Regional convergence was intense from 1940 to 1980. In this period, governments aided the convergence in productivity among industries and the reallocation of the workforce from the declining to the thriving regions and economic sectors. During the next period (1980-2000), when regional incomes diverged, governments subsidised firms and people in the declining areas.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-09-30T22:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

