http://hdl.handle.net/10016/4654 2013-05-24T08:43:17Z 2013-05-24T08:43:17Z Revilla, E. Sarkis, J. Modrego, Aurelia [modrego] http://hdl.handle.net/10016/15345 2012-09-14T23:28:44Z 1999-12-31T23:00:00Z

Title: An investigation of public and private R&D partnership Author(s): Revilla, E.; Sarkis, J.; Modrego, Aurelia [modrego] Abstract: In this paper we investigate public and private research and development relationships with respect to their performance. The study utilizes a database of over 250 of these relationships, funded by Spanish government agencies. The methodology includes the application of data envelopment analysis (DEA) to determine the relative performance ("efficiency") of the various projects. Description: 16th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August 2000 : A New Time

1999-12-31T23:00:00Z Lobo, Félix [flobo] http://hdl.handle.net/10016/14907 2012-07-19T13:20:43Z 2009-10-21T22:00:00Z

Title: La política farmacéutica en España y las contribuciones de la beca Merck desde el SESAM-UC3M Author(s): Lobo, Félix [flobo] Abstract: El interés de la Política farmacéutica para la investigación en ciencias sociales,la investigación económica en España, las contribuciones de la Beca Merck desde el SESAM/UC3M

2009-10-21T22:00:00Z García-Romero, Antonio Estrada, José M. Rodríguez-Vallejo, José M. http://hdl.handle.net/10016/12664 2012-07-19T13:33:16Z 2010-12-31T23:00:00Z

Title: Anatomy of scientific misconduct. Bibliotmetric analysis of the "Deja Vu" database Author(s): García-Romero, Antonio; Estrada, José M.; Rodríguez-Vallejo, José M. Abstract: Scientific misconduct is a worrying problem whose incidence is increasing due to the increasingly competitive research environment in many countries. Deja Vu is a publicly available database of highly similar citations identified by eTBLAST from PubMed. We performed a bibliometric analysis of 116 pairs of duplicated publications whose earlier papers were published in the period 2004-2005. We selected all the cases that have been confirmed by experts. Our aim was to determine to what extent the duplicates with shared authors (SA) are different from those with different authors (DA) in terms of citations and other relevant variables. To this extent, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of the scientific misconduct problem. Our results reveal that there is a clear differentiation between the two types of publications. In the case of papers with different authors, the duplicates received fewer citations than the duplicates with shared authors. Moreover, the DA duplicates are published with a delay of two years on average, one year more than that for SA duplicates. This pattern suggests that fraudulent scientists try to hide their scientific misconduct. Description: 13th Conference of the international Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Durban, South Africa. July 4-7, 2011.

2010-12-31T23:00:00Z Ruiz-Castillo, Javier [jrc] http://hdl.handle.net/10016/6675 2012-07-18T15:08:40Z 1993-01-31T23:00:00Z

Title: La distribución del gasto en España de 1973-74 a 1980-81 Author(s): Ruiz-Castillo, Javier [jrc]

1993-01-31T23:00:00Z