Publication:
Comparison of monolithic optical frequency comb generators based on Passively Mode-Locked Lasers for Continuous Wave mm-Wave and Sub-THz Generation

dc.affiliation.dptoUC3M. Departamento de Tecnología Electrónicaes
dc.affiliation.grupoinvUC3M. Grupo de Investigación: Optoelectrónica y Tecnología Láser (GOTL)es
dc.contributor.authorCriado Serrano, Ángel Rubén
dc.contributor.authorDios Fernández, Cristina de
dc.contributor.authorAcedo Gallardo, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorCarpintero del Barrio, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorYvind, K.
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-18T09:48:25Z
dc.date.available2013-02-18T09:48:25Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-01
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, two different Passive Mode-Locked Laser Diodes (PMLLD) structures, a Fabry-Perot cavity and a ring cavity laser are characterized and evaluated as monolithic Optical Frequency Comb Generators (OFCG) for CW sub-THz generation. An extensive characterization of the devices under study is carried out based on an automated measurement system that systematically evaluates the dynamic characteristics of the devices, focusing on the figures of merit that define the optimum performance of a pulsed laser source when considered as an OFCG. Sub-THz signals generated with both devices at 60 GHz and 90 GHz are presented and analyzed in terms of electrical linewidth to compare such components for mm-Wave and sub-THz photonic generation. This work offers a systematic comparison of PMLLD devices for OFCG operation and provides reference information of the performance of two different device topologies that can be used for the implementation of photonic integrated sub-THz CW generation.
dc.description.sponsorshipWe acknowledge COBRA Research Institute, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands for the fabrication of the ring lasers within the joint European platform for InP-based components and circuits, JePPIX.
dc.description.statusPublicado
dc.format.extent10
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Lightwave Technology, (2012), 30(19), 3133-3141.
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/JLT.2012.2211998
dc.identifier.issn0733-8724 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1558-2213 (online)
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage3133
dc.identifier.publicationissue19
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage3141
dc.identifier.publicationtitleJournal of Lightwave Technology
dc.identifier.publicationvolume30
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10016/16318
dc.identifier.uxxiAR/0000010403
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOptical Society of America ; IEEE
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2012.2211998
dc.rights© IEEE
dc.rights© Optical Society of America
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.ecienciaElectrónica
dc.subject.ecienciaÓptica
dc.subject.otherMm-wave and THz photonic synthesis
dc.subject.otherOptical filtering
dc.subject.otherOptical Frequency Comb
dc.subject.otherOptical heterodyne photomixing
dc.subject.otherPassively mode-locked lasers
dc.titleComparison of monolithic optical frequency comb generators based on Passively Mode-Locked Lasers for Continuous Wave mm-Wave and Sub-THz Generation
dc.typeresearch article*
dc.type.hasVersionAM*
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
comparison_JLT_2012_ps.pdf
Size:
2.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format